Roughly eight in ten religious parents expect their children to keep their faith. About a third of American adults have not. That gap is where this hurts.
The hard part of faith deconstruction is rarely the belief. It is Sunday dinner.
It is the question that is not quite a question, the pause before someone says grace, the way your mother's voice changes when she asks what you did this weekend. You have moved. They have not. Nobody said anything unforgivable, and something between you has gone careful.
There is research on this, and it is more useful than you might expect, because it explains the shape of the problem rather than just confirming it is hard.
Two numbers put together explain most of what happens in these families.
The first: among parents who are weekly religious attenders, 93 percent say their children are likely to follow the same religion they do, according to PRRI. Among Christian parents overall, roughly eight in ten say the same.
The second: 35 percent of US adults were raised with a different religious identity than the one they hold now, according to Pew Research Center's Religious Landscape Study, a nationally representative survey of 36,908 adults conducted between July 2023 and March 2024.
So the expectation is near-universal among devout parents, and it is wrong about a third of the time. Your parents were not being unreasonable to assume continuity. Nearly everyone around them assumed it too. They were simply holding a forecast that, statistically, often does not come true.
That reframe is worth more than it looks. What you are up against is usually not a verdict on you. It is a collision with an expectation formed long before you were old enough to disagree with it.
The scale is not marginal. Pew found 21.9 percent of US adults are former Christians, about six times the share who became Christian after being raised otherwise, and that around 53 million Americans have become religiously unaffiliated. Most of that change happens early: 85 percent of switchers changed by age 30.
It is also quieter than the word deconstruction suggests. Asked why they left, the most common answer was that they stopped believing the teachings, cited by 46 percent, and 42 percent of those now unaffiliated said they "gradually drifted away." Most people did not have a crisis. They had a slow change of mind, which is harder to explain to a family that would find a dramatic story easier to understand.
You are not imagining the change in the relationship, and it is not a sign you handled it badly.
Using three waves of the National Study of Youth and Religion, following 2,352 people, Hendricks and colleagues found that leaving one's religion predicted poorer parent-child relationship quality at the next wave. The route it traveled is the useful part: the effect ran partly through a measurable decrease in parental warmth.
Two things follow. Warmth is specific, not a mood: it can be named, asked for and offered back. And because the mechanism is warmth rather than the belief difference itself, there is more room to work than the standoff suggests. The study followed adolescents and young adults, so if you are forty this is adjacent evidence rather than a description of you.
The bigger finding comes from research on estrangement. Megan Gilligan, Jill Suitor and Karl Pillemer studied 2,013 mother and adult child pairs and found that value dissimilarity strongly predicted estrangement, while violating serious societal norms did not. Writing about her own study, Gilligan named religion directly as one of the value differences involved.
And here is the part that should change what you do. Their qualitative data showed estrangement arriving not through a rupture but through gradual mutual withdrawal: the tension becomes unbearable, so both sides pull back, a little at a time. Later work by the same group found that movement in and out of estrangement reflected "nuanced changes in contact and closeness over time rather than abrupt changes."
Nobody decides. It just erodes. Which means the thing to watch is not whether you have a big argument. It is whether you are slowly calling less.
People are often startled by how much of this feels like mourning when nobody has died and nobody has even stopped speaking to them.
Pauline Boss's concept of ambiguous loss is the closest fit. She describes it as a loss that "defies resolution" and that "freezes the grief process," because it comes without the certification, rituals and recognized mourning that a death provides. Your family is right there. You will see them at Thanksgiving. And a particular version of the relationship, the one where you could say anything and be understood, is not available anymore.
Researchers have extended the idea beyond families to the loss of a faith community itself, finding that people can experience ambiguous loss in relation to a community of faith, and that the distress can persist whether they stay or move on.
Our article on why leaving your church can feel like grief covers that side in more detail, and when your faith and your wellbeing feel at odds is for people still in the middle of deciding.
There is one finding here that is unusually concrete, and it is not the advice people expect.
Karl Pillemer, a Cornell sociologist, surveyed more than 1,300 Americans for his book on family rifts and interviewed people who had reconciled. Almost all the successful reconcilers did the same thing: they abandoned the need for the other person to accept their version of the past and to apologize, and focused instead on the present and future of the relationship, with more realistic expectations of who the other person is.
Read that against your own situation. If you are waiting for your father to concede that the way you were raised did damage, and he is waiting for you to come back, you are both holding out for a ruling that is not coming. Those reconcilers did not get vindication. They got a relationship, on smaller terms than the one they wanted.
His survey was conducted for a trade book rather than published as peer-reviewed research, so treat the specifics as informed rather than definitive. The direction it points, though, lines up with what the estrangement research says about gradual withdrawal.
Two more things worth holding. Differentiation of self, the family systems idea of staying connected to people without dissolving into them or cutting off from them, has broad research support: a review of 295 studies found it associated with better psychological health and better intergenerational relationships. The same review notes a shortage of causal research and little evidence that interventions reliably change it, so take it as a useful frame rather than a technique.
And estrangement, where it happens, is often a chapter rather than an ending. In a nationally representative study, most adult children who had been estranged were no longer estranged at a later wave: 81 percent with mothers and 69 percent with fathers.
It is worth saying plainly what therapy is for here, because people arrive braced for an agenda.
We are not a faith-based counseling practice, and we do not have a position on what you should believe. A therapist's job in this is not to talk you out of your family's religion or back into it. It is to help with the grief, the ambivalence, and the practical question of how to stay in relationship with people you love who did not move when you did.
The Healing Effect works with clients across Arizona, in person and by telehealth for clients located in the state. There is more about this work on our faith transitions page, and you can get in touch through our contact form. If what you are carrying is closer to harm than to difference, healing from religious trauma without losing yourself is the more relevant piece.
And one thing to keep in mind over the next few holidays. The research says these relationships rarely end in a decision. They thin out, one skipped call at a time, until the distance looks like a conclusion somebody reached. You do not have to resolve the disagreement to stop that. You mostly have to keep showing up while it stays unresolved, which is harder, and more within your control.
If the calm on the outside is costing you a lot on the inside, our care team can help you find a therapist who fits, at your pace.
Reach OutPartly because almost all religious parents expect continuity. PRRI found that 93 percent of weekly attenders say their children are likely to follow their religion, while Pew found 35 percent of US adults no longer hold the identity they were raised with. Research also suggests that for parents who view raising children in the faith as a sacred responsibility, a child's departure registers as a loss on their side rather than only as a disagreement.
Yes, and there is a framework for it. Pauline Boss's concept of ambiguous loss describes a loss that defies resolution and freezes the grief process because it lacks the certification, rituals and recognized mourning that follow a death. Your family is still present, and a particular version of the relationship is not. Researchers have also applied the idea to the loss of a faith community itself.
Common. Pew's Religious Landscape Study, a survey of 36,908 US adults conducted in 2023 and 2024, found 35 percent hold a different religious identity than the one they were raised with, and that 21.9 percent of US adults are former Christians. About 53 million Americans have become religiously unaffiliated after being raised in a religion.
Slowly. Research on mother and adult child estrangement found it typically develops through gradual mutual withdrawal as tension becomes unbearable, rather than through an abrupt break, and that movement in and out of estrangement reflected nuanced changes in contact and closeness over time. The practical implication is that reduced contact is a more reliable warning sign than conflict.
Not here. The Healing Effect is not a faith-based counseling practice and we do not have a position on what you should believe. The work is on the grief, the family relationships and your own sense of yourself, in whatever direction your beliefs end up going.
The Healing Effect is not a crisis service. If you are in crisis or thinking about harming yourself, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Sources:
PRRI. Family Religious Dynamics and Interfaith Relationships, Spotlight Analysis, May 10, 2024 (93 percent of parents who attend religious services at least weekly, 84 percent of white Christian parents and 79 percent of Christian parents of color say their children are likely to follow the same religion; 21 percent of Americans say their parents' religious backgrounds differed from each other).
Pew Research Center. Religious Switching, and Decline of Christianity in the US Has Slowed, February 26, 2025, from the 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study (36,908 US adults surveyed July 17, 2023 to March 4, 2024; 35 percent raised with a different religious identity than the one they hold now; 21.9 percent are former Christians; about 53 million have become religiously unaffiliated; 85 percent of switchers changed by age 30).
Pew Research Center. Why Do Some Americans Leave Their Religion While Others Stay?, December 15, 2025, from an American Trends Panel survey of 8,937 US adults conducted May 5 to 11, 2025 (46 percent stopped believing the teachings; 42 percent of those now unaffiliated gradually drifted away).
Hendricks JJ, Hardy SA, Taylor EM, Dollahite DC. Does Leaving Faith Mean Leaving Family? Longitudinal Associations Between Religious Identification and Parent-Child Relationships Across Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2024;63(1):23-41 (three waves of the National Study of Youth and Religion, N = 2,352; deconversion predicted poorer parent-child relationship quality, with a significant indirect effect through decreased parental warmth). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed.
Gilligan M, Suitor JJ, Pillemer K. Estrangement Between Mothers and Adult Children: The Role of Norms and Values. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2015;77(4):908-920 (2,013 mother and adult child pairs in 561 families; value dissimilarity a strong predictor of estrangement while violation of serious societal norms was not; value dissimilarity created severe relational tension leading to estrangement). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed. Religion named as an example of value difference by the first author in her own plain-language account of the study at https://theconversation.com/why-do-some-moms-cut-ties-with-their-kids-46453.
Gilligan M, Suitor JJ, Pillemer K. Patterns and Processes of Intergenerational Estrangement. Research on Aging. 2022;44(5-6):436-447 (61 older mothers interviewed about 274 adult children at two points seven years apart; movement in and out of estrangement reflected nuanced changes in contact and closeness rather than abrupt changes). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed.
Boss P. Origins and history of ambiguous loss (ambiguous loss defies resolution, freezes the grief process, and offers none of the markers of certification, community ritual and recognized mourning that accompany a death; the two forms, physically absent and psychologically present, or physically present and psychologically absent). https://www.ambiguousloss.com/about/origins-history/ Scholarly reference: Boss P. The Context and Process of Theory Development: The Story of Ambiguous Loss. Journal of Family Theory and Review. 2016;8(3):269-286.
Okrey Anderson S, McGuire JK. Faith and Ambiguous Loss Among Transgender Youth. Family Relations. 2021;70(2):390-401 (the first application of ambiguous loss theory to religion and religious rejection; participants' narratives included all the core elements of ambiguous loss, indicating that people can experience ambiguous loss in relation to a faith community; distress persisted whether people stayed or moved on). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed.
Pillemer K. Fault Lines: Fractured Families and How to Mend Them, reported by the Cornell Chronicle (national survey of more than 1,300 Americans; 27 percent had cut off contact with a family member; among those who reconciled, almost all abandoned the need for the estranged relative to accept their version of the past and to apologize, focusing instead on the present and future with more realistic expectations). Survey conducted for a trade book rather than published as peer-reviewed research; the fielding date and methodology are not stated.
Reczek R, Stacey L, Thomeer MB. Parent-adult child estrangement in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2023;85(2):494-517 (National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 and its Child and Young Adult supplement; 81 percent of estranged adult children became unestranged from mothers and 69 percent from fathers in subsequent waves). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed.
Calatrava M, Martins MV, Schweer-Collins M, Duch-Ceballos C, Rodriguez-Gonzalez M. Differentiation of self: A scoping review of Bowen Family Systems Theory's core construct. Clinical Psychology Review. 2022;91:102101 (295 primary studies; ample support as a predictor of psychological health and positive associations with intergenerational relationships; a paucity of longitudinal or causal designs and of evidence that interventions modify it).
Blake L. Parents and Children Who Are Estranged in Adulthood: A Review and Discussion of the Literature. Journal of Family Theory and Review. 2017;9(4):521-536 (consequences of estrangement include reduced psychological well-being, feelings of loss, and experiences or perceptions of stigma). Publisher-deposited abstract read; full text not accessed.
Tell us a little about what is going on and our care team will help you find a therapist who fits, at your pace.
Reach Out